|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Wes
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1013
Age: 28
Localisation: Jersey Shore, PA
Registration date: 2007-12-07
 |  Subject: Packers/Dolphins  Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:39 pm | |
| Dolphins Get: QB Colt Brennan 77 / ?? Rookie CB Paul Oliver 81 / ?? Rookie RT #54 Erik Young 76/?? ROokie Packers Get: WR Marty Booker 82 / 31 CB Andre Goodman 74 / 29 ILB Donnie Spragan 75/ 31 DE Marcellus Wiley 78/34 I agree. this is a trade of necessity. I get a young Corner and a Groomable QB both rookies that can help in my rebuilding process, he gets veterens, that will upgrade his depth. |
|
  | |
BrettFavreIsYourFather
Pro Bowler
Number of posts: 896
Age: 19
Registration date: 2007-09-10
| |
| | |
Wes
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1013
Age: 28
Localisation: Jersey Shore, PA
Registration date: 2007-12-07
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:45 pm | |
| Secondly this trade should be automatically approved. Since our last one was, but do to a false D/C, we had to cancel it, but that's just my opinion.  |
|
| | |
Ruskie89
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1816
Localisation: 2089, 2089, 2089....
Registration date: 2007-10-25
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:58 pm | |
| |
|
| | |
Wes
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1013
Age: 28
Localisation: Jersey Shore, PA
Registration date: 2007-12-07
| |
| | |
Wes
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1013
Age: 28
Localisation: Jersey Shore, PA
Registration date: 2007-12-07
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:41 am | |
| Any results yet on this trade? |
|
| | |
SoxNats08
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 6292
Age: 16
Localisation: New England
Registration date: 2007-07-09
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:49 am | |
| | TheBigTunaKing wrote: | | Any results yet on this trade? |
0-0_________________  2007 Washington Redskins 13-3-0, SUPER BOWL WINNERS |
|
| | |
Wes
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1013
Age: 28
Localisation: Jersey Shore, PA
Registration date: 2007-12-07
| |
| | |
eaglesfan90
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1966
Registration date: 2007-10-16
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:24 pm | |
| Denied 0 - 3 | Quote: |
That is what the two GM's said about this deal.
1. I don't understand how this improves the packers depth. Other than booker nothing is really helpfull for him.
2. Packers say they can afford to lose oliver because he is getting a good CB in return.  . I don't see how a 74/ 29 CB is a good CB in return.
If a team is trading youth for vets, the vets should be rated somewhat higher than the youth going out to make up for the age difference.
Adding an extra low 70's player on one side does not make up for the youth given.
It wouldn't be the end ot the world if the trade was approved, because these are low rated players.
Still I am going to vote no. |
|
|
| | |
Wes
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1013
Age: 28
Localisation: Jersey Shore, PA
Registration date: 2007-12-07
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:32 pm | |
| This is ABSOLUTE FUCKING HORSESHIT! This was a good trade. I've seen other trades of similar nature get passed. Everyone who voted no on this, should post your resignation from the Trade Council. |
|
| | |
eaglesfan90
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1966
Registration date: 2007-10-16
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:36 pm | |
| If you state your case in a more organized and proper way, we would be happy to re-review it |
|
| | |
Wes
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1013
Age: 28
Localisation: Jersey Shore, PA
Registration date: 2007-12-07
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:44 pm | |
| | eaglesfan90 wrote: | | If you state your case in a more organized and proper way, we would be happy to re-review it |
Okay, you're right.
My case. I got a 1st trade with them APPROVED, but had to be rejected since no one knows the definition of D/C Maintainence.
Now i even add a guy..that PACKERS asked for, not me. And It still gets rejected?
Yet if it were the colts and Skins or Raiders this trade would've been approved quicker than hell. |
|
| | |
mksadng
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1840
Registration date: 2007-07-13
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:08 pm | |
| | TheBigTunaKing wrote: | | eaglesfan90 wrote: | | If you state your case in a more organized and proper way, we would be happy to re-review it |
Okay, you're right.
My case. I got a 1st trade with them APPROVED, but had to be rejected since no one knows the definition of D/C Maintainence.
Now i even add a guy..that PACKERS asked for, not me. And It still gets rejected?
Yet if it were the colts and Skins or Raiders this trade would've been approved quicker than hell. |
Im sorry, but would you care to actually do some research before you make such a silly assumption. Ive had a heck of a lot more trades denied then ive gotten them approved, your trade got rejected, either re work it or scrap it all together ive had enough of your conspiracy theorys._________________  Major Props to SoxNats07 on the sig^^^^ |
|
| | |
Wes
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1013
Age: 28
Localisation: Jersey Shore, PA
Registration date: 2007-12-07
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:41 pm | |
| | mksadng wrote: | | TheBigTunaKing wrote: | | eaglesfan90 wrote: | | If you state your case in a more organized and proper way, we would be happy to re-review it |
Okay, you're right.
My case. I got a 1st trade with them APPROVED, but had to be rejected since no one knows the definition of D/C Maintainence.
Now i even add a guy..that PACKERS asked for, not me. And It still gets rejected?
Yet if it were the colts and Skins or Raiders this trade would've been approved quicker than hell. |
Im sorry, but would you care to actually do some research before you make such a silly assumption. Ive had a heck of a lot more trades denied then ive gotten them approved, your trade got rejected, either re work it or scrap it all together ive had enough of your conspiracy theorys. |
It's not a conspiracy theory, it's the truth.
The Trade council needs MAJOR improvement. Especially in terms of mk. |
|
| | |
mksadng
Hall of Famer
Number of posts: 1840
Registration date: 2007-07-13
| | Subject: Re: Packers/Dolphins Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:52 pm | |
| | TheBigTunaKing wrote: | | mksadng wrote: | | TheBigTunaKing wrote: | | eaglesfan90 wrote: | | If you state your case in a more organized and proper way, we would be happy to re-review it |
Okay, you're right.
My case. I got a 1st trade with them APPROVED, but had to be rejected since no one knows the definition of D/C Maintainence.
Now i even add a guy..that PACKERS asked for, not me. And It still gets rejected?
Yet if it were the colts and Skins or Raiders this trade would've been approved quicker than hell. |
Im sorry, but would you care to actually do some research before you make such a silly assumption. Ive had a heck of a lot more trades denied then ive gotten them approved, your trade got rejected, either re work it or scrap it all together ive had enough of your conspiracy theorys. |
It's not a conspiracy theory, it's the truth.
The Trade council needs MAJOR improvement. Especially in terms of mk. |
Really? I wasnt aware that you can view the trade council. The trade council is fine stop complaining because one of your trades got denied, I just had a trade denied yesterday but im not going to cause a huge fuss the trade got denied get over it, rework it or stop complaining because were not going to do a revote everytime somone bitches about a trade._________________ Major Props to SoxNats07 on the sig^^^^ |
|
| | |
|
i get vet depth
