| Trades | |
|
+9wildcats catspajamas BarackObama4Prez SimsZilla SoxNats08 Ruskie89 Touchdown Jesus! eaglesfan90 Big_Z 13 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Trades Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:58 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- If we did decide to do this plan, I think here would be our representatives:
AFC East: silva or dragon AFC North: Ruskie AFC South: MK or EF90 AFC West: Zoom NFC East: SoxNats NFC North: DC NFC South: Simszilla NFC West: Max
Should we poll it? Appreciate the representation, but I would decline it in favor of Wildcats, who is also in the AFC North as the Bengals GM. My personal opinion is that we keep things the way they are. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. So far I think that only one person started this thread and only another has created this idea and carried. If you like Sox, we can go ahead and poll this idea, but I think that we lose some of the very active highly knowledgable members of the TC for the sake of this "ideaology". In addition, removing some of the more active members would result in : 1. Trades being slowed down in terms of voting (and causing every to be more irritated), and 2. Some valuable opinions and views being lost. | |
|
| |
catspajamas Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 627 Age : 32 Localisation : CT Registration date : 2007-07-14
| Subject: Re: Trades Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:01 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- If we did decide to do this plan, I think here would be our representatives:
AFC East: silva or dragon AFC North: Ruskie AFC South: MK or EF90 AFC West: Zoom NFC East: SoxNats NFC North: DC NFC South: Simszilla NFC West: Max
Should we poll it? Appreciate the representation, but I would decline it in favor of Wildcats, who is also in the AFC North as the Bengals GM.
My personal opinion is that we keep things the way they are. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. So far I think that only one person started this thread and only another has created this idea and carried. If you like Sox, we can go ahead and poll this idea, but I think that we lose some of the very active highly knowledgable members of the TC for the sake of this "ideaology".
In addition, removing some of the more active members would result in : 1. Trades being slowed down in terms of voting (and causing every to be more irritated), and 2. Some valuable opinions and views being lost. how would trades be slowed down, it still would only take 3 votes, and its not like the people elected are random ppl, they are on alot | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 2219 Age : 33 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| |
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| |
| |
mksadng Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1840 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Trades Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:39 pm | |
| I dont like this idea at all, no reason to take EF90 out of the TC hes a GREAT Trade Council member.
IMO we could add 1 or 2 new TC members but the whole conference thing is ridiculous and if it comes down to that id like to give my Trade Council spot to EF90. | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292 Age : 30 Localisation : New England Registration date : 2007-07-09
| Subject: Re: Trades Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:42 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- If we did decide to do this plan, I think here would be our representatives:
AFC East: silva or dragon AFC North: Ruskie AFC South: MK or EF90 AFC West: Zoom NFC East: SoxNats NFC North: DC NFC South: Simszilla NFC West: Max
Should we poll it? Appreciate the representation, but I would decline it in favor of Wildcats, who is also in the AFC North as the Bengals GM.
My personal opinion is that we keep things the way they are. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. So far I think that only one person started this thread and only another has created this idea and carried. If you like Sox, we can go ahead and poll this idea, but I think that we lose some of the very active highly knowledgable members of the TC for the sake of this "ideaology".
In addition, removing some of the more active members would result in : 1. Trades being slowed down in terms of voting (and causing every to be more irritated), and 2. Some valuable opinions and views being lost. I agree with Ruskie. Sorry wildcats, I completely forgot about you | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Trades Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:47 pm | |
| i love the two pat gms there | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Trades Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:48 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- i love the two pat gms there
Spygate, votegate | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Trades Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:57 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- i love the two pat gms there
Spygate, votegate shh, trying to keep that quite but if it makes you happy we will not bring any camares in to the oting section | |
|
| |
wildcats Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 760 Registration date : 2007-08-01
| Subject: Re: Trades Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:20 am | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- If we did decide to do this plan, I think here would be our representatives:
AFC East: silva or dragon AFC North: Ruskie AFC South: MK or EF90 AFC West: Zoom NFC East: SoxNats NFC North: DC NFC South: Simszilla NFC West: Max
Should we poll it? Appreciate the representation, but I would decline it in favor of Wildcats, who is also in the AFC North as the Bengals GM.
My personal opinion is that we keep things the way they are. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. So far I think that only one person started this thread and only another has created this idea and carried. If you like Sox, we can go ahead and poll this idea, but I think that we lose some of the very active highly knowledgable members of the TC for the sake of this "ideaology".
In addition, removing some of the more active members would result in : 1. Trades being slowed down in terms of voting (and causing every to be more irritated), and 2. Some valuable opinions and views being lost. Thanks Ruskie, But If I had to give up my spot I am sure you would do a great job. - I did nominate you in the last round of voting. I don't have a problem with the new system, other than the fact its going to lead to a few good TC members not being on TC anymore. | |
|
| |
Zsirvone28 Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 730 Age : 33 Localisation : Pittsburgh Registration date : 2007-10-28
| Subject: Re: Trades Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:16 am | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- If we did decide to do this plan, I think here would be our representatives:
AFC East: silva or dragon AFC North: Ruskie AFC South: MK or EF90 AFC West: Zoom NFC East: SoxNats NFC North: DC NFC South: Simszilla NFC West: Max
Should we poll it? Appreciate the representation, but I would decline it in favor of Wildcats, who is also in the AFC North as the Bengals GM.
My personal opinion is that we keep things the way they are. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. So far I think that only one person started this thread and only another has created this idea and carried. If you like Sox, we can go ahead and poll this idea, but I think that we lose some of the very active highly knowledgable members of the TC for the sake of this "ideaology".
In addition, removing some of the more active members would result in : 1. Trades being slowed down in terms of voting (and causing every to be more irritated), and 2. Some valuable opinions and views being lost. I agree with Ruskie.
Sorry wildcats, I completely forgot about you And me too? I guess going to work a few days in a row bumps you out of this league... Sorry for not being as active guys. | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292 Age : 30 Localisation : New England Registration date : 2007-07-09
| Subject: Re: Trades Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:54 pm | |
| - Zsirvone28 wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- If we did decide to do this plan, I think here would be our representatives:
AFC East: silva or dragon AFC North: Ruskie AFC South: MK or EF90 AFC West: Zoom NFC East: SoxNats NFC North: DC NFC South: Simszilla NFC West: Max
Should we poll it? Appreciate the representation, but I would decline it in favor of Wildcats, who is also in the AFC North as the Bengals GM.
My personal opinion is that we keep things the way they are. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. So far I think that only one person started this thread and only another has created this idea and carried. If you like Sox, we can go ahead and poll this idea, but I think that we lose some of the very active highly knowledgable members of the TC for the sake of this "ideaology".
In addition, removing some of the more active members would result in : 1. Trades being slowed down in terms of voting (and causing every to be more irritated), and 2. Some valuable opinions and views being lost. I agree with Ruskie.
Sorry wildcats, I completely forgot about you And me too? I guess going to work a few days in a row bumps you out of this league... Sorry for not being as active guys. Ahh I've lost my memory... sorry | |
|
| |
Zsirvone28 Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 730 Age : 33 Localisation : Pittsburgh Registration date : 2007-10-28
| Subject: Re: Trades Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:08 pm | |
| No biggie, it's probably because of my inactivity recently. | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292 Age : 30 Localisation : New England Registration date : 2007-07-09
| Subject: Re: Trades Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:23 pm | |
| - Zsirvone28 wrote:
- No biggie, it's probably because of my inactivity recently.
no i just forgot of the cardinals, i was thinking NFC west and i thought of seahawks, sry | |
|
| |
Zsirvone28 Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 730 Age : 33 Localisation : Pittsburgh Registration date : 2007-10-28
| Subject: Re: Trades Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:25 pm | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- Zsirvone28 wrote:
- No biggie, it's probably because of my inactivity recently.
no i just forgot of the cardinals, i was thinking NFC west and i thought of seahawks, sry Haha awww. Not a problem man. We will all remember the Cards for years to come though now Zsirvone28 has taken over as GM. | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| |
| |
Neumatic Team Captain
Number of posts : 266 Registration date : 2007-11-13
| |
| |
Zsirvone28 Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 730 Age : 33 Localisation : Pittsburgh Registration date : 2007-10-28
| Subject: Re: Trades Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:56 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Neumatic Team Captain
Number of posts : 266 Registration date : 2007-11-13
| Subject: Re: Trades Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:46 pm | |
| not like i have room to be talking...Pittsburgh isnt exactly flourishing with talent right now | |
|
| |
Zsirvone28 Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 730 Age : 33 Localisation : Pittsburgh Registration date : 2007-10-28
| Subject: Re: Trades Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:50 pm | |
| - Neumatic wrote:
- not like i have room to be talking...Pittsburgh isnt exactly flourishing with talent right now
Haha very true. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Trades | |
| |
|
| |
| Trades | |
|