Lions/patriots

Lions
Anoton Cason(rookie CB)
Willis Mcgehhe

Patriots
Darren Mcfadden
09 3rd rounder

I agree to the trade

DC agrees to the trade VIA AIM(cause i'm fianlly on AIM )

silvabiltz (2:26:24 PM): alright can you say a line saying you agree to the trade than
drewcorrothers (2:27:04 PM): yessir

I agree


Approved or?

Whats going on here?

Rejected 1-3

Here is the TC's comments:

Quote :

ill vote yes, he is the best rookie RB and will sky rocket in rating after a year.

Quote :

Quote :

ill vote yes, he is the best rookie RB and will sky rocket in rating after a year.

no actually he MIGHT sky rocket...madden works in mysterious ways. Ive drafted top 5 players who ended up being 75s and never got above 78.

I vote NO

Quote :

i vote no, there isnt a huge difference between mcfadden and cason. i mighta approved cason + early 2nd for mcfadden, but an 85 RB and a 76 which you dont get until next year for a 93 RB and an 83/84 CB...

Quote :

I'll vote no as well.

I am ok with swapping Mcgahee for McFadden, but Carson for the 09 third rounder seems quite a bit off.

HOW DOES THIS GET REJECTED AND MY DEAL WITH DALLAS DOESNT.

TRADE COUNCIL IS SHITTY

I cant believe my deal with Dallas gets passed, but this one doesn't what bullshit our TC are pissing me off

DC wrote:

I cant believe my deal with Dallas gets passed, but this one doesn't what bullshit our TC are pissing me off

I hate to say it, but i have to agree with DC here...if you're gonna value that #1 pick so much, knowing more than likely McFadden was the pick, he should still be valued that high.

We all know he will succeed in the NFL, barring any major injury. And after seeing him today, there is no question. I know I'm no longer on the trade council, but that deal should go through...if anything have DC make it an 09 2nd rounder, then accept it. I'm sure he wouldn't be against that...

Sorry to interfere, I just wanted to voice my opinion

cav_fan2 wrote:

DC wrote:

I cant believe my deal with Dallas gets passed, but this one doesn't what bullshit our TC are pissing me off

I hate to say it, but i have to agree with DC here...if you're gonna value that #1 pick so much, knowing more than likely McFadden was the pick, he should still be valued that high.

We all know he will succeed in the NFL, barring any major injury. And after seeing him today, there is no question. I know I'm no longer on the trade council, but that deal should go through...if anything have DC make it an 09 2nd rounder, then accept it. I'm sure he wouldn't be against that...

Sorry to interfere, I just wanted to voice my opinion

Don't worry, you aren't interfering. Opinions are welcome and encouraged.

SoxNats07 wrote:

cav_fan2 wrote:

DC wrote:

I cant believe my deal with Dallas gets passed, but this one doesn't what bullshit our TC are pissing me off

I hate to say it, but i have to agree with DC here...if you're gonna value that #1 pick so much, knowing more than likely McFadden was the pick, he should still be valued that high.

We all know he will succeed in the NFL, barring any major injury. And after seeing him today, there is no question. I know I'm no longer on the trade council, but that deal should go through...if anything have DC make it an 09 2nd rounder, then accept it. I'm sure he wouldn't be against that...

Sorry to interfere, I just wanted to voice my opinion

Don't worry, you aren't interfering. Opinions are welcome and encouraged.

I would voice my opinion, but I'm one of those people that has a hard time of putting things into words. When I think of how to word it, I'll be back.

just saying i wasnt one of those 3 NOs =)

max1 wrote:

just saying i wasnt one of those 3 NOs =)

.

Max...I love you

I was on the fence about this one. I think McFadden is a better option than McGahee. I have seen McFadden's rating come out at 88-87 for the most part. I just didn't think there was enough to make up the difference between at top ten pick this year and an 09 third round pick.


If the voting could be reopened I would consider changing my vote(if we are allowed to). I think DC and Silva have shown they know what they are doing and taking that in to account, I might give this a yes. That would make it 2-2.

I hate to go against my gut reaction of no to this one, but if both side are willing to accept that there is a disparity of value on one side of this trade, then I think it could go through.

according to the new rule, if you both agree it can be approved

i agree, and DC will def agree

silvabiltz wrote:

i agree, and DC will def agree

I agree

approved

and processed