Ravens Broncos

Baltimore Ravens get:

CB Domonique Foxworth-84 Age 25


Denver Broncos get:

2008 pick #156 Fifth Round Baltimore
2009 2nd round pick Baltimore



I need a CB, I ask price for Foxworth, he names it, I agree.

i agree

Awful trade for the broncos

really, FUCKKKKKKK i disagree then

mksadng wrote:

Awful trade for the broncos

Considering he named the price?

Also, aren't voters supposed to vote in secrecy? Guess your still pissed off you didn't rip off the new guy. At any rate, we'll negotiate.

No actually im not pissed off...because im a much more competitive team if I dont do that deal, you're just pissed off because you didnt get Domonique Foxworth for some scrub draft picks...

really, FUCKKKKKKK i disagree then

catspajamas wrote:

really, FUCKKKKKKK i disagree then

lol yes cats we got it the first time haha

mksadng wrote:

No actually im not pissed off...because im a much more competitive team if I dont do that deal, you're just pissed off because you didnt get Domonique Foxworth for some scrub draft picks...

Actually, No I'm not. I asked him for what he wants, he said "2nd", I asked "2 2nds", he said, "No, 1"


And sadly, you still don't grasp the fact that we are simming on current gen system, not next gen. Sorry, but while the 360 may have 1st rounders rated 80 and 2nd rated 78, in current gen systems, the players in first are 84ish, and in the 2nd are 80ish. He's now going to get 2 2nd round picks for an 84, who would have been 4th on his depth chart.

I doubt their will be many 80s in the second round and regardless of what he is on his depth chart he could get A LOT more then 2 2nd rounders for Domonique Foxworth

mksadng wrote:

I doubt their will be many 80s in the second round and regardless of what he is on his depth chart he could get A LOT more then 2 2nd rounders for Domonique Foxworth

ok? Maybe I was the ones with the brains to ask him for Foxworth? Or you the kind of person who denies, then offers a better deal?

As for your 80s in the second round, once again, I am telling you from my experience with current gen that most 2nd round picks range from 78-82, hence me saying 80.

rejected 0-3

I think part of the issue was that the picks were 09 picks rather than 08. Because the other side will not see a return until the next year, the picks carry somewhat less value.- this is in reference to the revision.

SoxNats07 wrote:

rejected 0-3

We revised this in the other tread.

wildcats wrote:

I think part of the issue was that the picks were 09 picks rather than 08. Because the other side will not see a return until the next year, the picks carry somewhat less value.

One was this year, the other next year. But I kinda see what your saying, so I bumped the 5th to a 2nd next year. Should net him about an 80ish player (due to NCAA 08 progressions for guys staying) at positions of need, since he seems to like his 3 CB ahead of Fox.