patriots/ falcons

patriots
Shawn Bryson 88 FB/32
Kelly Jennings 82 CB/26
Quentin Groves ?? DE/24

Falcons
JarvisGreen 83 DE/29
Ricky manning JR 85 CB/28
Heath Evans 85 FB/29
7th rounder this year

since they are all the same positon i guess you can do this

AGE=27( falconsGive )
28(Patriots Give)

overal rating-84(patriots give)
Falcons give 84

EDIT-ADD TEAMS

i'm also guess that groves is 82 in the math stuff

silvabiltz wrote:

patriots
Bryson 88 FB/32
jennings 82 CB/26
Groves ?? DE/24

Falcons
Green 83 DE/29
manning JR 85 CB/28
Evans 85 FB/29
7th rounder this year

since they are all the same positon i guess you can do this

AGE=27( falconsGive )
28(Patriots Give)

overal rating-84(patriots give)
Falcons give 84

EDIT-ADD TEAMS

you actually cant because

u could do this trade

99/25 QB + 82/25 C for 99/25 C + 82/25 QB

avg overall is 90.5 on both sides, avg age is 25 so by your definition itd be even

i agree.

well alright, but all the postions are the same, and i did one for age too


but it doesn't matter
i'm do math homwork so i just added it in

Cannot be voted on until Full Names are added (Just following the rules)

bump

Denied 0-5

Quote :

Bryson is 88 OVR 32 years old FB, Evans is 3 years younger and 3 OVR less, which imo makes it even roughly, Manning is slightly older than Jennings and 3 OVR higher, and hence is better than Jennings. But the biggest reason I'm a no is that its Green and a 7th pick for Groves, who is a young DE and was a 1st round projected (and drafted) pick. Would you say that Green and a 7th is equal to a 1st round pick? Absolutely not. Pats stated that he thinks Groves is an 82, my opinion is that he may be closer to 84, but all the same, a guy with a TON of potential (and 1st round pick) for a slow (but strong) DE and a 7th? That's not flying, and I deny it based on that.

Everyone is pretty much agreeable on this explanation

what else would needed to be added to make this fly

silvabiltz wrote:

what else would needed to be added to make this fly

With that explanation, i have very little in giving up more for less.

HCWesWilliams wrote:

silvabiltz wrote:

what else would needed to be added to make this fly

With that explanation, i have very little in giving up more for less.

Every part of the trade is roughly equal, until you get to Groves for Green + 7th. Fact is, Groves was a projected 1st round pick, and was selected in the first round. It is basically a 1st rounder for Green + 7th, which I am sure everyone would want to get the 1st in that deal. Perhaps make that 7th round pick higher, and then it may pass.

just for the purpose, what round ?

silvabiltz wrote:

just for the purpose, what round ?

Personally, I would probably say, oh, nothing lower than the 3rd. Again, that is just my personal view. 1st should be about = 3rd + 83 Green.

would a fourth be alright