| Unsigned Rookies | |
|
+8Wes DC Zsirvone28 silvablitz SoxNats08 Ruskie89 laraiders2006 eaglesfan90 12 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
eaglesfan90 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1966 Registration date : 2007-10-15
| Subject: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:31 pm | |
| The bills, fins, titans, chargers, eagles, and panthers have not completed their signings, if they are not done by tonight, these teams lose their top rookie, also, if Sox said in your thread you have to fix yours, you must get them done by tonight! | |
|
| |
laraiders2006 Starter
Number of posts : 102 Age : 41 Registration date : 2007-12-11
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:14 pm | |
| - eaglesfan90 wrote:
- The bills, fins, titans, chargers, eagles, and panthers have not completed their signings, if they are not done by tonight, these teams lose their top rookie, also, if Sox said in your thread you have to fix yours, you must get them done by tonight!
What happens to the players then? | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:20 pm | |
| - eaglesfan90 wrote:
- The bills, fins, titans, chargers, eagles, and panthers have not completed their signings, if they are not done by tonight, these teams lose their top rookie, also, if Sox said in your thread you have to fix yours, you must get them done by tonight!
That's rather harsh, some of the guys might be gone for the holidays, etc. Maybe just sign their top rookies or however many fit, rather than just release 1st round picks... | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292 Age : 30 Localisation : New England Registration date : 2007-07-09
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:47 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- eaglesfan90 wrote:
- The bills, fins, titans, chargers, eagles, and panthers have not completed their signings, if they are not done by tonight, these teams lose their top rookie, also, if Sox said in your thread you have to fix yours, you must get them done by tonight!
That's rather harsh, some of the guys might be gone for the holidays, etc. Maybe just sign their top rookies or however many fit, rather than just release 1st round picks... i posted it about a week ago... What punishment would you suggest? | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:57 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- eaglesfan90 wrote:
- The bills, fins, titans, chargers, eagles, and panthers have not completed their signings, if they are not done by tonight, these teams lose their top rookie, also, if Sox said in your thread you have to fix yours, you must get them done by tonight!
That's rather harsh, some of the guys might be gone for the holidays, etc. Maybe just sign their top rookies or however many fit, rather than just release 1st round picks... i posted it about a week ago...
What punishment would you suggest? Uh, well, I figured just sign their 1st and 2nd rounders, but as punishment sign their top player at least, and release the rest? | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292 Age : 30 Localisation : New England Registration date : 2007-07-09
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:00 pm | |
| what's more valuable
an 85 or 82, 81, 81, 80, 78, 77, 76 (just made up an average draft class)
id take the second group | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:16 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- what's more valuable
an 85 or 82, 81, 81, 80, 78, 77, 76 (just made up an average draft class)
id take the second group meh, I don't know, you da boss lol. | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:30 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Zsirvone28 Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 730 Age : 33 Localisation : Pittsburgh Registration date : 2007-10-28
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:41 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- why not just autosign ?
I completely agree with this, autosign until the team has a 55 man roster. | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:42 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
DC Team Captain
Number of posts : 368 Registration date : 2007-09-12
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:42 pm | |
| - Zsirvone28 wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- why not just autosign ?
I completely agree with this, autosign until the team has a 55 man roster. I agree as well. Its the holiday, and some people just have rare time around these weeks which is very understandable. Just sing until the roster is full and make others FA. That seems to be the best and fairest route here to take. | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:49 pm | |
| - DC wrote:
- Zsirvone28 wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- why not just autosign ?
I completely agree with this, autosign until the team has a 55 man roster.
I agree as well. Its the holiday, and some people just have rare time around these weeks which is very understandable. Just sing until the roster is full and make others FA. That seems to be the best and fairest route here to take. Says the man with an avatar condeming the US and Bush with Nazis and Hitler | |
|
| |
Wes Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1013 Age : 42 Localisation : Jersey Shore, PA Registration date : 2007-12-06
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:53 pm | |
| - Zsirvone28 wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- why not just autosign ?
I completely agree with this, autosign until the team has a 55 man roster. While i'm all for having an opporunity to Sign these guys I don't AT ALL think that they should lose their picks to free agency. First of all, let's not pretend that draft was anything less than shaky. And it's the holidays, by tonight? what if people, from the teams that you listed there are still on vacation or something. | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:01 pm | |
| - HCWesWilliams wrote:
- Zsirvone28 wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- why not just autosign ?
I completely agree with this, autosign until the team has a 55 man roster. While i'm all for having an opporunity to Sign these guys
I don't AT ALL think that they should lose their picks to free agency.
First of all, let's not pretend that draft was anything less than shaky. And it's the holidays, by tonight? what if people, from the teams that you listed there are still on vacation or something. or just give them to new england | |
|
| |
eaglesfan90 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1966 Registration date : 2007-10-15
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:37 pm | |
| - HCWesWilliams wrote:
- Zsirvone28 wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- why not just autosign ?
I completely agree with this, autosign until the team has a 55 man roster. While i'm all for having an opporunity to Sign these guys
I don't AT ALL think that they should lose their picks to free agency.
First of all, let's not pretend that draft was anything less than shaky. And it's the holidays, by tonight? what if people, from the teams that you listed there are still on vacation or something. Then they should've posted that they are on vacation This was put up last week, maybe today is a little early, but we can't just auto-sign, because if we do, what incentive do the people get that actually did their shit?, nothing, teams that don't comply should be punished in some form, we did some auto-resigning before Free Agency, as a GM, it is your responsibility to step to the plate and get it done, I'd be fine with a delay of a day or two, but punishments must be handed down, all these GMs have been on since this was posted. | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:25 pm | |
| well really there is no dolphins gm
and really the other guys are only one once on a blue moon | |
|
| |
laraiders2006 Starter
Number of posts : 102 Age : 41 Registration date : 2007-12-11
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:29 pm | |
| OK. So these people go back into what we can call a "Supplimental Draft"? and follow the same draft order that we had in the 08 draft yr. | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:19 pm | |
| - laraiders2006 wrote:
- OK. So these people go back into what we can call a "Supplimental Draft"? and follow the same draft order that we had in the 08 draft yr.
but thats BS for the teams we should just autosign the first 3-4 rounds than supp draft everyone else | |
|
| |
Wes Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1013 Age : 42 Localisation : Jersey Shore, PA Registration date : 2007-12-06
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 7:03 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- laraiders2006 wrote:
- OK. So these people go back into what we can call a "Supplimental Draft"? and follow the same draft order that we had in the 08 draft yr.
but thats BS for the teams
we should just autosign the first 3-4 rounds than supp draft everyone else Agree with this 100% You can't force teams to lose top rated Draft picks, simply because other GM's are droolin' over them. i realiize you have a system, but I really think the first 3 rounds need to be auto-signed. | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:54 pm | |
| - HCWesWilliams wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- laraiders2006 wrote:
- OK. So these people go back into what we can call a "Supplimental Draft"? and follow the same draft order that we had in the 08 draft yr.
but thats BS for the teams
we should just autosign the first 3-4 rounds than supp draft everyone else Agree with this 100% You can't force teams to lose top rated Draft picks, simply because other GM's are droolin' over them.
i realiize you have a system, but I really think the first 3 rounds need to be auto-signed. Agreed 100%. | |
|
| |
A.J. Hawk Fan Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 663 Age : 33 Registration date : 2007-12-01
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:56 pm | |
| IMO, first 3 rounds should be auto signed... than release the rest.
FIND NEW OWNERS! | |
|
| |
Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:56 pm | |
| - Falcons Guy wrote:
- IMO, first 3 rounds should be auto signed... than release the rest.
FIND NEW OWNERS! It's the holidays........... some people will be gone obviously....... although some do need to be replaced. | |
|
| |
Wes Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1013 Age : 42 Localisation : Jersey Shore, PA Registration date : 2007-12-06
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:58 pm | |
| - Falcons Guy wrote:
- IMO, first 3 rounds should be auto signed... than release the rest.
FIND NEW OWNERS! EXACTLY. For teams that have INACTIVE GM's, ALL THEIR PICKS, should be Auto-signed, not just the first 3 rounds. For Teams with Active GM's the first 3 rounds should be Auto-signed, then after that, consider it them fucking themselves. | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:28 pm | |
| i have to help the chargers with his signings since he is still new | |
|
| |
eaglesfan90 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1966 Registration date : 2007-10-15
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:42 pm | |
| - HCWesWilliams wrote:
- Falcons Guy wrote:
- IMO, first 3 rounds should be auto signed... than release the rest.
FIND NEW OWNERS!
EXACTLY. For teams that have INACTIVE GM's, ALL THEIR PICKS, should be Auto-signed, not just the first 3 rounds.
For Teams with Active GM's the first 3 rounds should be Auto-signed, then after that, consider it them fucking themselves. 1.How can we decide who is active and who is inactive? 2.Why do we reward those who are inactive, if they are that inactive that people actually notice it, then there should be a New GM in place IMO, being active and not doing your signings and being inactive should be equal in punishments. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Unsigned Rookies | |
| |
|
| |
| Unsigned Rookies | |
|