Darrele Revis 84/5

Darrele Revis 84/5

didn't get just go through a trade as an 82? Or is this the same situation as Bruce?

i was bored so i was look at stats and other shit

and on the raiders thing it said +2

so i guessing off season progression

silvabiltz wrote:

i was bored so i was look at stats and other shit

and on the raiders thing it said +2

Well, if it's not offseason progression, and just having the Chargers not have it updated, it could influence the trade.

AKA: Offseason progression, shit happens

Mistake in not updating progress: No idea what happens.

well i might be wrong

but either way his stats really were bad last season

and i mean bad

how does a number 2 Cb have only 16 tackles and 1 or 2 INTS

silvabiltz wrote:

well i might be wrong

but either way his stats really were bad last season

and i mean bad

how does a number 2 Cb have only 16 tackles and 1 or 2 INTS

16 tackles = shitload of breakups, hence no need to tackle WR? INTs = shit hands.

Ruskie89 wrote:

silvabiltz wrote:

i was bored so i was look at stats and other shit

and on the raiders thing it said +2

Well, if it's not offseason progression, and just having the Chargers not have it updated, it could influence the trade.

AKA: Offseason progression, shit happens

Mistake in not updating progress: No idea what happens.

influence shinfluence.

If it's a mistake, it's a matter of saying oh well and biting hte bullet.

HCWesWilliams wrote:

Ruskie89 wrote:

silvabiltz wrote:

i was bored so i was look at stats and other shit

and on the raiders thing it said +2

Well, if it's not offseason progression, and just having the Chargers not have it updated, it could influence the trade.

AKA: Offseason progression, shit happens

Mistake in not updating progress: No idea what happens.

influence shinfluence.

If it's a mistake, it's a matter of saying oh well and biting hte bullet.

When the deciding factor was 3 OVR roughly = 4 years, and trade close enough to slide and pass, then 1 OVR and 4 years..... Naturally you'd want to have it bite.

I'm just saying, if it was offseason, nothing can be done. If it was a mistake on behalf of the Chargers GM (Who is new, btw) not know that the progressions weren't updated, well then...

well it was after the Raiders playoffs which should equal offseason progression

silvabiltz wrote:

well i might be wrong

but either way his stats really were bad last season

and i mean bad

how does a number 2 Cb have only 16 tackles and 1 or 2 INTS

because he was my #3 CB, I had rashean mathis and anthony henry infront of him

Touchdown Jesus! wrote:

silvabiltz wrote:

well i might be wrong

but either way his stats really were bad last season

and i mean bad

how does a number 2 Cb have only 16 tackles and 1 or 2 INTS

because he was my #3 CB, I had rashean mathis and anthony henry infront of him

Then those stats aren't bad for a nickel CB. And how do you have 1-2? It's either 1 or 2 lol

can't remember

but sox says i got to keep him since it is off season progression

so today has beeen a good day

Jamie Silva is a monster in todays game and now me getting to keep revis

silvabiltz wrote:

can't remember

but sox says i got to keep him since it is off season progression

so today has beeen a good day

Jamie Silva is a monster in todays game and now me getting to keep revis

If that's what it is, then I agree 100%.

the progressions came when sox released the progressions for the playoff games, I know that much

here is a quick qwuestion

what was the rookie TE that the Raiders draft this something hilton ?

zach miller?

alright who has him in this league ?

no idea, check last year' draft. He was taken in real life in the 2nd round so Im guessing he'll have been taken between that and the 4th round in this league