Washington Redskins, 2008 Champions Build a Team, Win the Super Bowl, and Create a Dynasty |
| | Seahawks | |
| |
Record | 12-16 | | 43% | [ 3 ] | 8-12 | | 57% | [ 4 ] | 4-8 | | 0% | [ 0 ] | 0-4 | | 0% | [ 0 ] |
| Total Votes : 7 | | Poll closed |
| Author | Message |
---|
max1 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1934 Age : 30 Registration date : 2007-07-15
| Subject: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:57 pm | |
| How do u think the seahawks will do? | |
| | | Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:15 pm | |
| - max1 wrote:
- How do u think the seahawks will do?
12-4, loss in playoffs to either Raiders or Colts. | |
| | | SoxNats08 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292 Age : 30 Localisation : New England Registration date : 2007-07-09
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:19 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- max1 wrote:
- How do u think the seahawks will do?
12-4, loss in playoffs to either Raiders or Colts. you know hes in the NFC, right? | |
| | | Wes Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1013 Age : 42 Localisation : Jersey Shore, PA Registration date : 2007-12-06
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:39 pm | |
| Your Division is a tough one, but you have a pretty good team.
10-6 in a tough conference and a loss in the divisional Playoff Game to the 49ers. | |
| | | Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:42 pm | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- max1 wrote:
- How do u think the seahawks will do?
12-4, loss in playoffs to either Raiders or Colts. you know hes in the NFC, right? Then he either loses to Redskins or Falcons. | |
| | | Wes Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1013 Age : 42 Localisation : Jersey Shore, PA Registration date : 2007-12-06
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:48 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- max1 wrote:
- How do u think the seahawks will do?
12-4, loss in playoffs to either Raiders or Colts. you know hes in the NFC, right? Then he either loses to Redskins or Falcons. Dude..quit.. just quit.. I don't mean the league, i mean quit the bitching, quit posting 85 threads with your attitude.. I initially felt the same way you did, I have calmed down and gave out my apologies, I overreacted and you're not only overreacting you're taking it too far. | |
| | | Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:02 pm | |
| - TheBigTunaKing wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- max1 wrote:
- How do u think the seahawks will do?
12-4, loss in playoffs to either Raiders or Colts. you know hes in the NFC, right? Then he either loses to Redskins or Falcons.
Dude..quit.. just quit.. I don't mean the league, i mean quit the bitching, quit posting 85 threads with your attitude.. I initially felt the same way you did, I have calmed down and gave out my apologies, I overreacted and you're not only overreacting you're taking it too far. WTF are you talking about? Do you want me to release my power rankings or something? Cuz I think that the NFC goes like this: Falcons, Redskins, Seahawks (off the top of my head), and the AFC: (Was Ravens ), Raiders/Colts, vice versa (split on those two, but leaning towards LT). | |
| | | Wes Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1013 Age : 42 Localisation : Jersey Shore, PA Registration date : 2007-12-06
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:04 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- TheBigTunaKing wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- max1 wrote:
- How do u think the seahawks will do?
12-4, loss in playoffs to either Raiders or Colts. you know hes in the NFC, right? Then he either loses to Redskins or Falcons.
Dude..quit.. just quit.. I don't mean the league, i mean quit the bitching, quit posting 85 threads with your attitude.. I initially felt the same way you did, I have calmed down and gave out my apologies, I overreacted and you're not only overreacting you're taking it too far. WTF are you talking about? Do you want me to release my power rankings or something? Cuz I think that the NFC goes like this: Falcons, Redskins, Seahawks (off the top of my head), and the AFC: (Was Ravens ), Raiders/Colts, vice versa (split on those two, but leaning towards LT). First of all, the Ravens were never above the Colts and Patriots. | |
| | | Ruskie89 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816 Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089.... Registration date : 2007-10-24
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:07 pm | |
| - TheBigTunaKing wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- TheBigTunaKing wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- max1 wrote:
- How do u think the seahawks will do?
12-4, loss in playoffs to either Raiders or Colts. you know hes in the NFC, right? Then he either loses to Redskins or Falcons.
Dude..quit.. just quit.. I don't mean the league, i mean quit the bitching, quit posting 85 threads with your attitude.. I initially felt the same way you did, I have calmed down and gave out my apologies, I overreacted and you're not only overreacting you're taking it too far. WTF are you talking about? Do you want me to release my power rankings or something? Cuz I think that the NFC goes like this: Falcons, Redskins, Seahawks (off the top of my head), and the AFC: (Was Ravens ), Raiders/Colts, vice versa (split on those two, but leaning towards LT). First of all, the Ravens were never above the Colts and Patriots. That is my personal opinion. If you like, I can break it down when I get back from eating. | |
| | | Wes Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1013 Age : 42 Localisation : Jersey Shore, PA Registration date : 2007-12-06
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:11 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- TheBigTunaKing wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- TheBigTunaKing wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- max1 wrote:
- How do u think the seahawks will do?
12-4, loss in playoffs to either Raiders or Colts. you know hes in the NFC, right? Then he either loses to Redskins or Falcons.
Dude..quit.. just quit.. I don't mean the league, i mean quit the bitching, quit posting 85 threads with your attitude.. I initially felt the same way you did, I have calmed down and gave out my apologies, I overreacted and you're not only overreacting you're taking it too far. WTF are you talking about? Do you want me to release my power rankings or something? Cuz I think that the NFC goes like this: Falcons, Redskins, Seahawks (off the top of my head), and the AFC: (Was Ravens ), Raiders/Colts, vice versa (split on those two, but leaning towards LT). First of all, the Ravens were never above the Colts and Patriots. That is my personal opinion. If you like, I can break it down when I get back from eating. Go ahead and break it down, cuz i'll break it down for you too. the NE Pats(who I helped construct) and the Colts, are easily better than 75% of the AFC teams and that does include the Baltimore Ravens | |
| | | Wes Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1013 Age : 42 Localisation : Jersey Shore, PA Registration date : 2007-12-06
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:13 pm | |
| i'll create a thread for this debate, so we're not taking away from max' intended purpose with this one. | |
| | | max1 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1934 Age : 30 Registration date : 2007-07-15
| Subject: Re: Seahawks Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:36 pm | |
| - TheBigTunaKing wrote:
- i'll create a thread for this debate, so we're not taking away from max' intended purpose with this one.
thank you | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Seahawks | |
| |
| | | | Seahawks | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
|