| Should this trade be rejected | |
|
+2Touchdown Jesus! silvablitz 6 posters |
|
Rejected? | YES | | 73% | [ 8 ] | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | | 18% | [ 2 ] | NO | | 9% | [ 1 ] |
| Total Votes : 11 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:47 pm | |
| for some reason this deal was approved even though it's extremly lopsided
Pats Dallas Clark(85) 5th round pick
Colts Ben watson(88) 2nd round pick
not only is Watson better and younger the draft picks are f-up
i just want others to vote on this | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:50 pm | |
| I said before I thought it wasn't fair. Watson is a lot better.
It should be rejected.. |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:17 pm | |
| i'm beating zoom voted ---------------- | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 2219 Age : 33 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:19 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- i'm beating zoom voted ----------------
dam straight | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:20 pm | |
| well it's 4-0
if this trade gets rejected can you undo the deal after the season is done ? | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292 Age : 30 Localisation : New England Registration date : 2007-07-09
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:07 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- well it's 4-0
if this trade gets rejected can you undo the deal after the season is done ? yea i can do that | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:08 pm | |
| GREAT, can you please make this as a sticky so we don't foget | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 2219 Age : 33 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:09 pm | |
| have we even checked to make sure those picks werent involved in toehr trades? | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:12 pm | |
| he still has my second and i still have his fifth | |
|
| |
mksadng Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1840 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:13 pm | |
| wtf... you cant go back and reject a trade after its been approved this is fuckin BS the old pats GM said he wanted a TE with reliable hands not speed and thats what Dallas Clark is, hes a TE who WILL make the catch not catch it then fumble when he gets hit by a CB | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:15 pm | |
| then watson for clark than, is more than fair and even then Watson is better
why the fuck should a second rounder have to be added ?
if anything watson has more value than clark it's already worse enough i lose watson for this season but there should be no way this trade should have been approved, i wanna know who approved the deal ? | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292 Age : 30 Localisation : New England Registration date : 2007-07-09
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:16 pm | |
| wait a sec how is this different from the 3-way trade? i got fucked in it, yet it didnt get unrejected | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:19 pm | |
| your telling me you have no prob with this trade
a younger TE and better overal and a better overal pick for a TE with a lower overal, and a shit pick and older | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:25 pm | |
| and to MK
Dallas Clark
83 catch 64 Carry
Ben Watson 82-Catch 65-Carry | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 2219 Age : 33 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:25 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- your telling me you have no prob with this trade
a younger TE and better overal and a better overal pick for a TE with a lower overal, and a shit pick and older Its a brutal trade that should never have happened, but it did. We went through this whole thing before. Once a trade is approved and processed thats it, you just have to cut your losses afterwards and move on. You werent even the GM at the time of the trade. I can see why you feel your getting shit here because mk screwed patfan out of the deal. He took advantage of the old patriot GM and somehow the trade got approved, nobodies saying its fair, we're saying that to go back and unapprove an approved trade would be unfair | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:27 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- your telling me you have no prob with this trade
a younger TE and better overal and a better overal pick for a TE with a lower overal, and a shit pick and older Its a brutal trade that should never have happened, but it did. We went through this whole thing before. Once a trade is approved and processed thats it, you just have to cut your losses afterwards and move on. You werent even the GM at the time of the trade. I can see why you feel your getting shit here because mk screwed patfan out of the deal. He took advantage of the old patriot GM and somehow the trade got approved, nobodies saying its fair, we're saying that to go back and unapprove an approved trade would be unfair ok, but i still wanna know who approved that trade ? i just want a reason, cause i think almsot everyone has said yes to be it being rejected or ---- | |
|
| |
mksadng Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1840 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:28 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- and to MK
Dallas Clark
83 catch 64 Carry
Ben Watson 82-Catch 65-Carry wtf do u mean by carry... | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:29 pm | |
| as in when they carry the ball !
like the more likey the player is to fumble a ball | |
|
| |
mksadng Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1840 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:33 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- as in when they carry the ball !
like the more likey the player is to fumble a ball anyone who watched the Pats last year knows that Watson fumbled a lot and he didnt have the greatest hands either... | |
|
| |
mksadng Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1840 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:33 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- as in when they carry the ball !
like the more likey the player is to fumble a ball anyone who watched the Pats last year knows that Watson fumbled a lot and he didnt have the greatest hands either... | |
|
| |
Steve_Smith_#12 Team Captain
Number of posts : 222 Registration date : 2007-09-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:33 pm | |
| Silva, quit being a bitch about it.
It happened, it's done.
Get over it. | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:34 pm | |
| ok i know it can't be undone, but i still wanna know who approved the deal ?
i just want a explation
can i at least have that? | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 2219 Age : 33 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:37 pm | |
| - silvabiltz wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- silvabiltz wrote:
- your telling me you have no prob with this trade
a younger TE and better overal and a better overal pick for a TE with a lower overal, and a shit pick and older Its a brutal trade that should never have happened, but it did. We went through this whole thing before. Once a trade is approved and processed thats it, you just have to cut your losses afterwards and move on. You werent even the GM at the time of the trade. I can see why you feel your getting shit here because mk screwed patfan out of the deal. He took advantage of the old patriot GM and somehow the trade got approved, nobodies saying its fair, we're saying that to go back and unapprove an approved trade would be unfair
ok, but i still wanna know who approved that trade ? i just want a reason, cause i think almsot everyone has said yes to be it being rejected or ---- well one person voted no, im geussing thats mk and im not the only one who voted -------------------------------- w00t | |
|
| |
silvablitz Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1079 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:49 pm | |
| aaahhhh
why won't anyone own up and tell me who approved the deal ?
like i just want a reason | |
|
| |
mksadng Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1840 Registration date : 2007-07-12
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:52 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Should this trade be rejected | |
| |
|
| |
| Should this trade be rejected | |
|