| | Ravens Broncos Revised |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Ruskie89
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816
Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089....
Registration date : 2007-10-24
|  Subject: Ravens Broncos Revised  Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:48 pm | |
| Baltimore Ravens get:
CB Domonique Foxworth-84 Age 25
Denver Broncos get:
2009 2nd round pick Baltimore
2009 2nd round pick Dallas
I agree. He already has 2 better starters, and he values Ross more, so he gets value out of his 4 CB. In addition, I get a much needed starter opposite Chris McAlister. | |
|
| | |
catspajamas
Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 627
Age : 32
Localisation : CT
Registration date : 2007-07-14
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:49 pm | |
| i agree idk really, i prefer ross and well, its fine, | |
|
| | |
SoxNats08
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292
Age : 30
Localisation : New England
Registration date : 2007-07-09
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Ruskie89
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816
Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089....
Registration date : 2007-10-24
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:17 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- also rejected 0-3
I see, no biggie, we can rework it. Would a first round pick suffice, just to get an idea? | |
|
| | |
wildcats
Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 760
Registration date : 2007-08-01
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:17 pm | |
| An 09 first would net a yes vote from me. | |
|
| | |
Ruskie89
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816
Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089....
Registration date : 2007-10-24
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:19 pm | |
| - wildcats wrote:
- An 09 first would net a yes vote from me.
We are currently working on a deal that would involve multiple picks, including me giving him a first round pick. | |
|
| | |
SoxNats08
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292
Age : 30
Localisation : New England
Registration date : 2007-07-09
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:21 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- also rejected 0-3
I see, no biggie, we can rework it. Would a first round pick suffice, just to get an idea? 09 1st + another pick would be good | |
|
| | |
Ruskie89
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816
Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089....
Registration date : 2007-10-24
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:22 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- also rejected 0-3
I see, no biggie, we can rework it. Would a first round pick suffice, just to get an idea?
09 1st + another pick would be good we're working right now where he would get a 09 first, + maybe something like 2 09 seconds, for Fox and 09 second. Would that fly? | |
|
| | |
SoxNats08
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 6292
Age : 30
Localisation : New England
Registration date : 2007-07-09
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:23 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- also rejected 0-3
I see, no biggie, we can rework it. Would a first round pick suffice, just to get an idea?
09 1st + another pick would be good
we're working right now where he would get a 09 first, + maybe something like 2 09 seconds, for Fox and 09 second. Would that fly? 09 1st + two 09 seconds for foxworth and an 09 2nd? idk, but it seems good | |
|
| | |
wildcats
Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 760
Registration date : 2007-08-01
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:24 pm | |
| I can't speak for every one else but that would work for me. | |
|
| | |
Ruskie89
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816
Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089....
Registration date : 2007-10-24
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:29 pm | |
| - SoxNats07 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- Ruskie89 wrote:
- SoxNats07 wrote:
- also rejected 0-3
I see, no biggie, we can rework it. Would a first round pick suffice, just to get an idea?
09 1st + another pick would be good
we're working right now where he would get a 09 first, + maybe something like 2 09 seconds, for Fox and 09 second. Would that fly?
09 1st + two 09 seconds for foxworth and an 09 2nd?
idk, but it seems good Whoops, I meant 2 09 thirds. If not, would adding something like a 09 4th to it work? | |
|
| | |
Ruskie89
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816
Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089....
Registration date : 2007-10-24
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:30 pm | |
| - wildcats wrote:
- I can't speak for every one else but that would work for me.
I understand completely, the problem right now is that Cats felt he was getting good value with the last trade (2 2nd round picks 09), so its difficult to judge how much more is needed. | |
|
| | |
wildcats
Pro Bowler
Number of posts : 760
Registration date : 2007-08-01
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:33 pm | |
| The last one was rejected before I voted, but I posted that I would vote yes if it was an 09 1st and an 09 3rd or maybe 4th. | |
|
| | |
Ruskie89
Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 1816
Localisation : 2089, 2089, 2089....
Registration date : 2007-10-24
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:34 pm | |
| - wildcats wrote:
- The last one was rejected before I voted, but I posted that I would vote yes if it was an 09 1st and an 09 3rd or maybe 4th.
ok. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Ravens Broncos Revised | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Ravens Broncos Revised | |
|
