Patriots Season

what do you think the pats record is going to be

please also give an explation

under 5 games because I hate the pats

12+

Tom Brady is pretty self explainatory, McFadden as a rookie is no push over at 86 rating(will sky rocket during the season most likely).Solid young WR's that will improve and Brady will only help with it. Very solid o-line to block for brady and Dmac. D-line is really solid with Wilfork and Seymour. Solid LBers with youth that will aslo improve with PT. DB's are good with a ton of talent Bailey is awsome, Cromartie and Revis are Young studs and the safteys arent great but they can develop.

All in all, this is probably the best team in the AFC and maybe in the NFL. Id say 13-15 wins is realistic for this team. Also, this team will be a force in the future.

Better than the Colts, I dont think so

They may not have the QB-WR combo you do but overall i think they are a good bit better then your Colts. Every position on there team is solid with the Safteys being there weakest link.

Neumatic wrote:

They may not have the QB-WR combo you do but overall i think they are a good bit better then your Colts. Every position on there team is solid with the Safteys being there weakest link.

Have you looked at my team? I dont have one weakness except I could use a better DT...

mksadng wrote:

Neumatic wrote:

They may not have the QB-WR combo you do but overall i think they are a good bit better then your Colts. Every position on there team is solid with the Safteys being there weakest link.

Have you looked at my team? I dont have one weakness except I could use a better DT...

Better DT... Hmmm

Ruskie89 wrote:

mksadng wrote:

Neumatic wrote:

They may not have the QB-WR combo you do but overall i think they are a good bit better then your Colts. Every position on there team is solid with the Safteys being there weakest link.

Have you looked at my team? I dont have one weakness except I could use a better DT...

Better DT... Hmmm

LMAO

probaly at least 10... no more than 12.....

mksadng wrote:

Neumatic wrote:

They may not have the QB-WR combo you do but overall i think they are a good bit better then your Colts. Every position on there team is solid with the Safteys being there weakest link.

Have you looked at my team? I dont have one weakness except I could use a better DT...

No i made blind comments how i think the patriots have a better team then yours

Comparison...
QB-Equal
RB-Patriots
FB-Patriots
WR-Colts
TE-Colts
LT-Patriots
LG-Patriots
C-Colts
RG-Patriots
RT-Patriots

LE-Colts
DT-Patriots
RE-Patriots
LOLB-Colts
MLB-Patriots
ROLB-Patriots
CB-Patriots
SS-Colts
FS-Colts

K-Colts
P-Colts

of course this is my opinion...what should you care what i think about your team any how? If your team is better then the Patriots prove it, untill then my opinion is in favor of the Patriots.

This team, which I helped build, easily has the makings of a 13-14 win team. I got them at 13-3, barring injuries.

Neumatic wrote:

No i made blind comments how i think the patriots have a better team then yours

Comparison...
QB-Equal

Peyton had 40 TDs last year
Brady had I think 23

solid year for Brady but Peyton overpowered him. I think that with Peyton youve got an issue that hes rated 99 because thats the highest a rating will go... If there was no limit Id have him put at a 103 or something.

well look who he had last season

Wayne 96, Smith 99, watson 90

Brady had

stallworth 85, Curtis 85, and Clark 85

either way i was just looking to ask what were some weakness on my team


and it seems to be the same with SS

14-2 because when you start with a good team, you end with a good team.

silvablitz wrote:

well look who he had last season

Wayne 96, Smith 99, watson 90

Brady had

stallworth 85, Curtis 85, and Clark 85

i love how you used offseason progression on my players ratings but not urs

mksadng wrote:

silvablitz wrote:

well look who he had last season

Wayne 96, Smith 99, watson 90

Brady had

stallworth 85, Curtis 85, and Clark 85

i love how you used offseason progression on my players ratings but not urs

eitherway you had 100000000X the recievers he had. So its no coincidence that Peyton put up 40 TD's to Bradys 28 or so.

Neumatic wrote:

mksadng wrote:

silvablitz wrote:

well look who he had last season

Wayne 96, Smith 99, watson 90

Brady had

stallworth 85, Curtis 85, and Clark 85

i love how you used offseason progression on my players ratings but not urs

eitherway you had 100000000X the recievers he had. So its no coincidence that Peyton put up 40 TD's to Bradys 28 or so.

yeah but the pats have 999999999999999999999X the D the pats had to start off...and its not like he didnt start off with randy moss too. I think what the colts have done with their team is a million times the accomplishment then what has been done with the pats

Big_Z wrote:

Neumatic wrote:

mksadng wrote:

silvablitz wrote:

well look who he had last season

Wayne 96, Smith 99, watson 90

Brady had

stallworth 85, Curtis 85, and Clark 85

i love how you used offseason progression on my players ratings but not urs

eitherway you had 100000000X the recievers he had. So its no coincidence that Peyton put up 40 TD's to Bradys 28 or so.

yeah but the pats have 999999999999999999999X the D the pats had to start off...and its not like he didnt start off with randy moss too. I think what the colts have done with their team is a million times the accomplishment then what has been done with the pats

Which is a fraction compared to what has been done to the Redskins...

I inherited a 5-11 team and turned it into an SB champ.

Both of you guys had the top two teams in the NFL.

9-7 lose wildcard

catspajamas wrote:

9-7 lose wildcard

LOL someone's bitter.

SoxNats08 wrote:

Big_Z wrote:

Neumatic wrote:

mksadng wrote:

silvablitz wrote:

well look who he had last season

Wayne 96, Smith 99, watson 90

Brady had

stallworth 85, Curtis 85, and Clark 85

i love how you used offseason progression on my players ratings but not urs

eitherway you had 100000000X the recievers he had. So its no coincidence that Peyton put up 40 TD's to Bradys 28 or so.

yeah but the pats have 999999999999999999999X the D the pats had to start off...and its not like he didnt start off with randy moss too. I think what the colts have done with their team is a million times the accomplishment then what has been done with the pats

Which is a fraction compared to what has been done to the Redskins...

I inherited a 5-11 team and turned it into an SB champ.

Both of you guys had the top two teams in the NFL.

Skins have plenty of talent on their team, just because they have a bad record doesn't make their team bad.

TheBigTunaKing wrote:

catspajamas wrote:

9-7 lose wildcard

LOL someone's bitter.

haha im not bitter, but i think you think that your former team is a great team, when its good, but not near great yet

catspajamas wrote:

TheBigTunaKing wrote:

catspajamas wrote:

9-7 lose wildcard

LOL someone's bitter.

haha im not bitter, but i think you think that your former team is a great team, when its good, but not near great yet

It is a great team. It's got a LOT of talent, and we built it from the ground up, as it didn't have a whole lot to work with after "change in possession"

It's EASILY a Division winning team. Why? cuz no one in it's division, including my team stands a chance of winning against them.

That's 6 wins easy. So to say that he Pats will only get 3 others..c'mon now. you're smarter than that.

Ruskie89 wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

Big_Z wrote:

Neumatic wrote:

mksadng wrote:

silvablitz wrote:

well look who he had last season

Wayne 96, Smith 99, watson 90

Brady had

stallworth 85, Curtis 85, and Clark 85

i love how you used offseason progression on my players ratings but not urs

eitherway you had 100000000X the recievers he had. So its no coincidence that Peyton put up 40 TD's to Bradys 28 or so.

yeah but the pats have 999999999999999999999X the D the pats had to start off...and its not like he didnt start off with randy moss too. I think what the colts have done with their team is a million times the accomplishment then what has been done with the pats

Which is a fraction compared to what has been done to the Redskins...

I inherited a 5-11 team and turned it into an SB champ.

Both of you guys had the top two teams in the NFL.

Skins have plenty of talent on their team, just because they have a bad record doesn't make their team bad.

HATER